The formFields
directive is not available for Java, see formField and formFieldList.
formFields
Signature
def formFields(field: <FieldDef[T]>): Directive1[T]
def formFields(fields: <FieldDef[T_i]>*): Directive[T_0 :: ... T_i ... :: HNil]
def formFields(fields: <FieldDef[T_0]> :: ... <FieldDef[T_i]> ... :: HNil): Directive[T_0 :: ... T_i ... :: HNil]
The signature shown is simplified and written in pseudo-syntax, the real signature uses magnets. [1] The type <FieldDef>
doesn’t really exist but consists of the syntactic variants as shown in the description and the examples.
[1] See The Magnet Pattern for an explanation of magnet-based overloading.
Description
Extracts fields from requests generated by HTML forms (independently of HttpMethod
HttpMethod
used).
Form fields can be either extracted as a String or can be converted to another type. The parameter name can be supplied either as a String or as a Symbol. Form field extraction can be modified to mark a field as required, optional, or repeated, or to filter requests where a form field has a certain value:
"color"
- extract the value of field “color” as
String
- reject if the field is missing
"color".optional
- (symbolic notation
"color".?
) - extract the optional value of field “color” as
Option[String]
"color".withDefault("red")
- (symbolic notation
"color" ? "red"
) - extract the optional value of field “color” as
String
with default value"red"
"color".requiredValue("blue")
- (symbolic notation
"color" ! "blue"
) - require the value of field “color” to be
"blue"
and extract nothing - reject if the field is missing or can’t be unmarshalled to the given type
"amount".as[Int]
- extract the value of field “amount” as
Int
, you need a matching implicitUnmarshaller
Unmarshaller
in scope for that to work (see also Unmarshalling) - reject if the field is missing or can’t be unmarshalled to the given type
"amount".as(unmarshaller)
- extract the value of field “amount” with an explicit
Unmarshaller
Unmarshaller
- reject if the field is missing or can’t be unmarshalled to the given type
"distance".repeated
- extract multiple occurrences of field “distance” as
Iterable[String]
"distance".as[Int].repeated
- extract multiple occurrences of field “distance” as
Iterable[Int]
, you need a matching implicitUnmarshaller
Unmarshaller
in scope for that to work (see also Unmarshalling) "distance".as(unmarshaller).repeated
- extract multiple occurrences of field “distance” with an explicit
Unmarshaller
Unmarshaller
You can use Case Class Extraction to group several extracted values together into a case-class instance.
Requests missing a required field or field value will be rejected with an appropriate rejection.
There’s also a singular version, formField.
Query parameters can be handled in a similar way, see parameters.
Unmarshalling
Data POSTed from HTML forms is either of type application/x-www-form-urlencoded
or of type multipart/form-data
. The value of an url-encoded field is a String
while the value of a multipart/form-data
-encoded field is a “body part” containing an entity. This means that different kind of unmarshallers are needed depending on what the Content-Type of the request is:
- A
application/x-www-form-urlencoded
encoded field needs an implicitUnmarshaller<Option<String>, T>
Unmarshaller[Option[String], T]
- A
multipart/form-data
encoded field needs an implicitFromStrictFormFieldUnmarshaller[T]
For common data-types, these implicits are predefined so that you usually don’t need to care. For custom data-types it should usually suffice to create a FromStringUnmarshaller[T]
if the value will be encoded as a String
. This should be valid for all values generated by HTML forms apart from file uploads.
Details
It should only be necessary to read and understand this paragraph if you have very special needs and need to process arbitrary forms, especially ones not generated by HTML forms.
The formFields
directive contains this logic to find and decide how to deserialize a POSTed form field:
- It tries to find implicits of both types at the definition site if possible or otherwise at least one of both. If none is available compilation will fail with an “implicit not found” error.
- Depending on the
Content-Type
of the incoming request it first tries the matching (see above) one if available.- If only a
Unmarshaller<Option<String>, T>
Unmarshaller[Option[String], T]
is available when a request of typemultipart/form-data
is received, this unmarshaller will be tried to deserialize the body part for a field if the entity is of typetext/plain
or unspecified.- If only a
FromStrictFormFieldUnmarshaller[T]
is available when a request of typeapplication/x-www-form-urlencoded
is received, this unmarshaller will be tried to deserialize the field value by packing the field value into a body part with an entity of typetext/plain
. Deserializing will only succeed if the unmarshaller accepts entities of typetext/plain
.
If you need to handle encoded fields of a multipart/form-data
-encoded request for a custom type, you therefore need to provide a FromStrictFormFieldUnmarshaller[T]
.
Example
sourceval route =
formFields("color", "age".as[Int], "direction" ! "up") { (color, age, _) =>
complete(s"The color is '$color' and the age ten years ago was ${age - 10}")
}
// tests:
Post("/", FormData("direction" -> "up", "color" -> "blue", "age" -> "68")) ~> route ~> check {
responseAs[String] shouldEqual "The color is 'blue' and the age ten years ago was 58"
}
Get("/") ~> Route.seal(route) ~> check {
status shouldEqual StatusCodes.BadRequest
responseAs[String] shouldEqual "Request is missing required form field 'color'"
}
For more examples about the way how fields can specified see the examples for the parameters directive.