Class AskPattern.Askable<Req>

java.lang.Object
scala.AnyVal
org.apache.pekko.actor.typed.scaladsl.AskPattern.Askable<Req>
Type Parameters:
Req - The request protocol, what the other actor accepts
Enclosing class:
AskPattern

public static final class AskPattern.Askable<Req> extends scala.AnyVal
  • Constructor Details

  • Method Details

    • ref

      public RecipientRef<Req> ref()
    • $qmark

      public <Res> scala.concurrent.Future<Res> $qmark(scala.Function1<ActorRef<Res>,Req> replyTo, Timeout timeout, Scheduler scheduler)
      The ask-pattern implements the initiator side of a request–reply protocol. The ? operator is pronounced as "ask" (and a convenience symbolic operation kept since the previous ask API, if unsure which one to use, prefer the non-symbolic method as it leads to fewer surprises with the scope of the replyTo function)

      Note that if you are inside of an actor you should prefer ActorContext.ask as that provides better safety.

      The party that asks may be within or without an Actor, since the implementation will fabricate a (hidden) ActorRef that is bound to a Promise. This ActorRef will need to be injected in the message that is sent to the target Actor in order to function as a reply-to address, therefore the argument to the ask / ? operator is not the message itself but a function that given the reply-to address will create the message.

      
       case class Request(msg: String, replyTo: ActorRef[Reply])
       case class Reply(msg: String)
      
       implicit val system = ...
       implicit val timeout = Timeout(3.seconds)
       val target: ActorRef[Request] = ...
       val f: Future[Reply] = target ? (replyTo => Request("hello", replyTo))
       

      Note: it is preferable to use the non-symbolic ask method as it easier allows for wildcards for the replyTo: ActorRef.

    • ask

      public <Res> scala.concurrent.Future<Res> ask(scala.Function1<ActorRef<Res>,Req> replyTo, Timeout timeout, Scheduler scheduler)
      The ask-pattern implements the initiator side of a request–reply protocol.

      Note that if you are inside of an actor you should prefer ActorContext.ask as that provides better safety.

      The party that asks may be within or without an Actor, since the implementation will fabricate a (hidden) ActorRef that is bound to a Promise. This ActorRef will need to be injected in the message that is sent to the target Actor in order to function as a reply-to address, therefore the argument to the ask / ? operator is not the message itself but a function that given the reply-to address will create the message.

      
       case class Request(msg: String, replyTo: ActorRef[Reply])
       case class Reply(msg: String)
      
       implicit val system = ...
       implicit val timeout = Timeout(3.seconds)
       val target: ActorRef[Request] = ...
       val f: Future[Reply] = target.ask(replyTo => Request("hello", replyTo))
       // alternatively
       val f2: Future[Reply] = target.ask(Request("hello", _))
       

    • askWithStatus

      public <Res> scala.concurrent.Future<Res> askWithStatus(scala.Function1<ActorRef<StatusReply<Res>>,Req> replyTo, Timeout timeout, Scheduler scheduler)
      The same as <Res>ask(scala.Function1<org.apache.pekko.actor.typed.ActorRef<Res>,Req>,org.apache.pekko.util.Timeout,org.apache.pekko.actor.typed.Scheduler) but only for requests that result in a response of type pekko.pattern.StatusReply. If the response is a pekko.pattern.StatusReply.Success the returned future is completed successfully with the wrapped response. If the status response is a pekko.pattern.StatusReply.Error the returned future will be failed with the exception in the error (normally a pekko.pattern.StatusReply.ErrorMessage).
    • hashCode

      public int hashCode()
      Overrides:
      hashCode in class Object
    • equals

      public boolean equals(Object x$1)
      Overrides:
      equals in class Object