Actor References, Paths and Addresses
This chapter describes how actors are identified and located within a possibly distributed Pekko application.
The above image displays the relationship between the most important entities within an actor system, please read on for the details.
What is an Actor Reference
An actor reference is a subtype of
ActorRef, whose foremost purpose is to support sending messages to the actor it represents. Each actor has access to its canonical (local) reference through the
ActorContext.self field; this reference can be included in messages to other actors to get replies back.
There are several different types of actor references that are supported depending on the configuration of the actor system:
- Purely local actor references are used by actor systems which are not configured to support networking functions. These actor references will not function if sent across a network connection to a remote JVM.
- Local actor references when remoting is enabled are used by actor systems which support networking functions for those references which represent actors within the same JVM. In order to also be reachable when sent to other network nodes, these references include protocol and remote addressing information.
- Remote actor references represent actors which are reachable using remote communication, i.e. sending messages to them will serialize the messages transparently and send them to the remote JVM.
- There are several special types of actor references which behave like local actor references for all practical purposes:
PromiseActorRefis the special representation of a
Promisefor the purpose of being completed by the response from an actor.
org.apache.pekko.pattern.askcreates this actor reference.
DeadLetterActorRefis the default implementation of the dead letters service to which Pekko routes all messages whose destinations are shut down or non-existent.
EmptyLocalActorRefis what Pekko returns when looking up a non-existent local actor path: it is equivalent to a
DeadLetterActorRef, but it retains its path so that Pekko can send it over the network and compare it to other existing actor references for that path, some of which might have been obtained before the actor died.
- And then there are some one-off internal implementations which you should never really see:
- There is an actor reference which does not represent an actor but acts only as a pseudo-supervisor for the root guardian, we call it “the one who walks the bubbles of space-time”.
- The first logging service started before actually firing up actor creation facilities is a fake actor reference which accepts log events and prints them directly to standard output; it is
What is an Actor Path?
Since actors are created in a strictly hierarchical fashion, there exists a unique sequence of actor names given by recursively following the supervision links between child and parent down towards the root of the actor system. This sequence can be seen as enclosing folders in a file system, hence we adopted the name “path” to refer to it, although actor hierarchy has some fundamental difference from file system hierarchy.
An actor path consists of an anchor, which identifies the actor system, followed by the concatenation of the path elements, from root guardian to the designated actor; the path elements are the names of the traversed actors and are separated by slashes.
What is the Difference Between Actor Reference and Path?
An actor reference designates a single actor and the life-cycle of the reference matches that actor’s life-cycle; an actor path represents a name which may or may not be inhabited by an actor and the path itself does not have a life-cycle, it never becomes invalid. You can create an actor path without creating an actor, but you cannot create an actor reference without creating a corresponding actor.
You can create an actor, terminate it, and then create a new actor with the same actor path. The newly created actor is a new incarnation of the actor. It is not the same actor. An actor reference to the old incarnation is not valid for the new incarnation. Messages sent to the old actor reference will not be delivered to the new incarnation even though they have the same path.
Actor Path Anchors
Each actor path has an address component, describing the protocol and location by which the corresponding actor is reachable, followed by the names of the actors in the hierarchy from the root up. Examples are:
"pekko://my-sys/user/service-a/worker1" // purely local "pekko://firstname.lastname@example.org:5678/user/service-b" // remote
The interpretation of the host and port part (i.e.
host.example.com:5678 in the example) depends on the transport mechanism used, but it must abide by the URI structural rules.
Logical Actor Paths
The unique path obtained by following the parental supervision links towards the root guardian is called the logical actor path. This path matches exactly the creation ancestry of an actor, so it is completely deterministic as soon as the actor system’s remoting configuration (and with it the address component of the path) is set.
Actor path alias or symbolic link?
As in some real file-systems you might think of a “path alias” or “symbolic link” for an actor, i.e. one actor may be reachable using more than one path. However, you should note that actor hierarchy is different from file system hierarchy. You cannot freely create actor paths like symbolic links to refer to arbitrary actors.
How are Actor References obtained?
There are two general categories to how actor references may be obtained: by creating actors or by looking them up through the Receptionist.
Actor Reference and Path Equality
ActorRef match the intention that an
ActorRef corresponds to the target actor incarnation. Two actor references are compared equal when they have the same path and point to the same actor incarnation. A reference pointing to a terminated actor does not compare equal to a reference pointing to another (re-created) actor with the same path. Note that a restart of an actor caused by a failure still means that it is the same actor incarnation, i.e. a restart is not visible for the consumer of the
If you need to keep track of actor references in a collection and do not care about the exact actor incarnation you can use the
ActorPath as key, because the identifier of the target actor is not taken into account when comparing actor paths.
Reusing Actor Paths
When an actor is terminated, its reference will point to the dead letter mailbox, DeathWatch will publish its final transition and in general it is not expected to come back to life again (since the actor life cycle does not allow this).
What is the Address part used for?
When sending an actor reference across the network, it is represented by its path. Hence, the path must fully encode all information necessary to send messages to the underlying actor. This is achieved by encoding protocol, host and port in the address part of the path string. When an actor system receives an actor path from a remote node, it checks whether that path’s address matches the address of this actor system, in which case it will be resolved to the actor’s local reference. Otherwise, it will be represented by a remote actor reference.
Top-Level Scopes for Actor Paths
At the root of the path hierarchy resides the root guardian above which all other actors are found; its name is
"/". The next level consists of the following:
"/user"is the guardian actor for all user-created top-level actors; actors created using
ActorSystem.actorOfare found below this one.
"/system"is the guardian actor for all system-created top-level actors, e.g. logging listeners or actors automatically deployed by configuration at the start of the actor system.
"/deadLetters"is the dead letter actor, which is where all messages sent to stopped or non-existing actors are re-routed (on a best-effort basis: messages may be lost even within the local JVM).
"/temp"is the guardian for all short-lived system-created actors, e.g. those which are used in the implementation of
"/remote"is an artificial path below which all actors reside whose supervisors are remote actor references
The need to structure the name space for actors like this arises from a central and very simple design goal: everything in the hierarchy is an actor, and all actors function in the same way.